This is a video from April 5, 2017. Comments are open.
This is a video from April 5, 2017. Comments are open.
This is a video from April 5, 2017. Comments are open.
This is some evidence of how a $300 cloud buster can help neutralize the Geo-engineering agenda. Comments are open.
Written By: Tracey Watson March 14, 2017
In 2015, New York Times writer Nick Bilton wrote an article entitled “The Health Concerns in Wearable Tech,” warning the public that devices like smartphones and Apple Watches emit a low-level radiation which has been linked to cancer, brain tumors and other problems when worn close to the body for extended periods. His article was based on a press release issued by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in May of 2011, which warned, “The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer1, associated with wireless phone use.”
Bilton was not praised for his public health warning; in fact, the mainstream media attacked him, with many calling for his dismissal from the Times.
The truth is, there is ample evidence that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields emitted by cell phones and other devices could cause brain cancer. This has just been reinforced yet again, in a document released by the California Department of Public Health, entitled simply “Cell Phones and Health.”
The Department has been sitting on the document, which has been revised several times, for the past seven years, refusing to make it public. It was only when Joel Moskowitz, director of the Center for Family and Community Health at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health, sued the Department last year, and the judge indicated that she would order the release of the document, that the Department made it public.
The document states clearly, “Health officials are concerned about possible health effects from cell phone EMFs because some recent studies suggest that long-term cell phone use may increase the risk of brain cancer and other health problems.” [Emphasis added]
It also notes that studies have found that people diagnosed with certain forms of brain cancer are more likely to have used cellphones in the preceding decade and that the cancers usually occurred on the side of the head that their cellphones were most often used on. It adds, “These studies suggest that regular cell phone use increases the risk of developing some kinds of brain cancer.”
[su_button url=”http://emf.news/2017-03-14-after-years-of-secrecy-cell-phone-radiation-risks-are-finally-being-revealed.html” target=”_blank” style=”flat” background=”#e51f1f” color=”#ffffff” size=”4″ center=”yes” icon=”icon: check-square-o” text_shadow=”0px 0px 0px #000000″]Continue Reading[/su_button]
Additional Articles of Interest:
**(Natural News) A once-secret document detailing links between cell phones and brain cancer has been released by order of a California court. Entitled, “Cell Phones and Health,” the document was demanded in a lawsuit filed by Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., director of the Center for Family and Community Health at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health.
“I would like this document to see the light of day because it will inform the public that there is concern within the California Department of Public Health that cellphone radiation is a risk, and it will provide them with some information about how to reduce those risks,” Moskowitz told a local CBS affiliate.
The document says that “long-term cell phone use may increase the risk of brain cancer and other health problems” and admits that “cell phone EMFs can affect nearby cells and tissues.” In a special warning section about children, it also explains that “EMFs can pass deeper into a child’s brain than an adult’s.”
EMF stands for ElectroMagnetic Field. Follow more news about EMF at EMF.news. According to the document, there’s no evidence that EMF blocking devices for cell phones actually work, by the way. (I haven’t personally tested any in my lab, so I can’t say whether this is true or false, but from a commonsense scientific point of view, if they really blocked EMF signals from the phone, the phone would no longer be able to make calls because it couldn’t communicate with cell towers.)
California government deliberately hid this information from the public
The California government actively hid this document from the public for at least seven years, likely under pressure from industry lobbyists who have long sought to conceal the evidence of harm caused by cell phone radiation. In the same way that biotech companies seek to conceal the harm of GMOs… and pesticides manufacturers conceal the harm of pesticides… and vaccine promoters conceal the harm of mercury in vaccines, the cell phone industry doesn’t want any evidence linking EMFs and brain cancer to see the light of day.
In truth, your brain is under a massive chemical, electromagnetic and propaganda assault on a daily basis. Some of the many attacks on your brain include:
– Brain-damaging fluoride in the public water supply
– Mercury preservatives in flu shots
– Pesticides in non-organic food products
– EMFs from mobile phones
– WiFi broadcast signals
– Fake news media propaganda
– Brain-altering medications such as antidepressants
Follow more news about brain health at Brain.news.
Read the full text of the once-secret California document on cell phones and EMFs
Here’s the full text of the California document, now posted at Natural News:
Division of Environmental and Occupational Disease Control / California Department of Public Health
[su_button url=”http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-03-california-government-buried-the-truth-about-cell-phone-radiation-causing-brain-cancer-full-text-secret-document-emfs-penetrate-deeper-into-a-childs-brain.html” style=”flat” background=”#e51f1f” color=”#ffffff” size=”4″ center=”yes” icon=”icon: check-square-o” text_shadow=”0px 0px 0px #000000″]Continue Reading[/su_button]
*This article only represents a very small fraction of the research regarding the dangers associated with these devices. We encourage you to further your own research, and just wanted to provide a base to let you know that it’s something more of us need to pay attention to.
Did you know that a child’s brain absorbs much more radiation than that of an adult?
Dr. Martin Blank, Ph.D., from the Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics at Colombia University, has joined a group of scientists from around the world who are making an international appeal to the United Nations regarding the dangers associated with the use of various electromagnetic emitting devices, like cells phones and WiFi.
Below is a video of him outlining the various dangers associated with these devices.
Multiple studies have revealed that cell phone radiation can cause cancer. Did you know that The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radio frequency fields (including those from cell phones) as a possible carcinogen in 2011? (source) The dangers of cell phone use gained a lot of mainstream credibility in 2011 when the World Health Organization (WHO) admitted that cell phone radiation may cause cancer. The statement was based off of a cumulative decision made by a team of 31 scientists, from 14 different countries, after reviewing evidence that suggested this to be the case. You can read more about that HERE. It’s pretty startling news, especially given the fact that a child’s brain absorbs much more radiation than that of an adult.
Below is a video of Dr. Devra Davis, who is one of the most well-respected and credentialed researchers on the dangers of cellphones, among a number of other things.
… [A] cellphone is a two-way microwave radio,’ Dr. Davis pointed out.“Industry has fought successfully to use the phrase ‘radiofrequency energy’ instead of microwave radiation. Because they know radiofrequency energy sounds fine.
We listen to music with radios. Everybody needs more energy. What could be better than that?
But radiofrequency energy is another word for microwave radiation. If people understood that they were holding a two-way microwave-radiating device next to their brain or next to their reproductive organs, they might think differently about it. (source)
The first cell phone generation is now growing up, so if you are a parent, hopefully this gives you something to think about. HERE is a great interview she did with Dr. Mercola that is worth checking out as well.
Worrying is pointless, and solves nothing. That being said, coming across such information can be scary, and that’s the last reaction you should have; after all, our thoughts feelings and emotions alone have shown to have a significant effect on our biology, and letting go of fear could possibly be the first step in helping you limit the effect that EMFs could be having on your body. That being said, here are some others measures you can take:
As Dr. Mercola points out, until the industry starts taking this matter seriously, the responsibility to keep children safe falls on the parents. To minimize the risk to your brain, and that of your child, pay heed to the following advice:
You can measure your exposure from your cordless phone is to measure with an electrosmog meter, and it must be one that goes up to the frequency of your portable phone. As many portable phones are 5.8 Gigahertz, we recommend you look for RF meters that go up to 8 Gigahertz.
You can find RF meters at EMFSafetyStore.com. Even without an RF meter, you can be fairly certain your portable phone is problematic if the technology is labeled DECT, or digitally enhanced cordless technology. Alternatively, you can be very careful with the base station placement as that causes the bulk of the problem since it transmits signals 24/7, even when you aren’t talking.
“If you can keep the base station at least three rooms away from where you spend most of your time, and especially your bedroom, they may not be as damaging to your health. Ideally it would be helpful to turn off or disconnect your base station every night before you go to bed.” – Dr Mercola
The most dangerous place to be, in terms of radiation exposure, is within about six inches of the emitting antenna. You do not want any part of your body within that area while the phone is on.
If you are in a meeting, on public transportation, in a courtroom or other public places, such as a doctor’s office, keep your cell phone turned off out of consideration for the “secondhand radiation” effects. Children are also more vulnerable, so please avoid using your cell phone near children.
So make sure the wire used to transmit the signal to your ear is shielded. One of the best kinds of headsets use a combination of shielded wire and air-tube. These operate like a stethoscope, transmitting the sound to your head as an actual sound wave; although there are wires that still must be shielded, there is no wire that goes all the way up to your head.
Additional options to minimize your risks from dirty electricity, compiled by Paula Owens, M.S. for the Ahwatukee Foothill News, include:13
I’ve always been amused by the casual way that most of us do this work and achieve consistent, miraculous, long-lasting results around the planet. There are other ways to get it done in the short term but only orgonite keeps on working in the environment after the operator has gone and some evidence suggests that orgonite pieces network in a global fashion. Synergy is one of the main elements of real science and I don’t think the enemy are equipped to comprehend that. They rather seem to accomplish a dirty, degraded sort of synergy that’s based on the energy of decay, perhaps much like the Babylonian banksters’ financial system is based on ersatz debt and the destruction of hope. The mass-hypnotic effect of this ‘economic’ programming seems obvious to me when people lament about ‘the national debt.’ Everyone knows that these banksters don’t lend out real money, after all; they create it out of nothing and lend it to governments. If all of these banksters and their magical ledger books disappeared right now (Ascended Bastards?) the result would surely be nearly-instant global prosperity.
Trevor Constable has been a pioneer at generating rainfall since the 70s, I think. He started out on the sea when he was a ship’s officer. He was inspired in those days to just make fairly simple, dynamic metal shapes that rotated and it consistently generated rain along the routes. He later started employing Reich cloudbusters to end droughts and in those days he got pretty frustrated because the state of California refused to pay for the work after he generated some ‘free’ rain, ending a long drought in Los Angeles. It was probably some time later that the Chinese gov’t, though, hired him to reverse the Gobi Desert but the cloudbusters which were bringing rain to the desert had caused forest fires in an adjacent region and he had to stop, then. At least, this is what someone who knows him told me at the time.
At one point he was attaching simple metal tubes to wingstruts of small planes and generating rain on the ‘dry’ side of Oahu Island in Hawaii by simply flying those planes toward the barrier cliffs that were catching all the rain from the northeast tradewinds.
Lately, he’s developed some other method for generating rain but I presume it’s still interactive and needs that element to keep working. In the early years of this orgonite effort he used to say bad things about orgonite, claiming it doesn’t work. He was a frequent guest on Jeff Rense’s show in those days. I think he and Jeff Rense later stopped campaigning to discredit orgonite. That’s not surprising, considering how orgonite’s popularity is growing. The people rule and that’s always been so.
Another thing this amazing man did was to document the existence of living creatures in the atmosphere that can only be detected with infrared and x-ray (radar) equipment. They’re immune to gravity and exist in a broad range of size. I sort of wonder if they’re related to Sylphs. When he published that book (I think in the 1970s) his character was aggressively assaulted by prominent members of the UFO-observing community who felt threatened by the notion that these things were not spaceships, nor necessarily from another planet. The CIA/AirForce has always controlled this community, though, and long before the internet they were employing trained sociopaths (Delphi Protocols) to destroy the reputations of genuine researchers.
When my friends feel discouraged by the way we’re all supposed to be programmed to believe that ‘man is essentially evil’ I remind them that actual sociopaths never abuse people they don’t know. They rather abuse a very small circle of people who are closer to them but are unwilling or unable to break away. An abusive mother or father is an example of that. These people usually clam up in a more public setting. The NSA and other sociopathic institutions, though, are well capable of fielding a vast army of people who will show up as trolls in every conceivable social group and will be such a constant distraction that they usually just cause the groups to disintegrate. We could say that in any group of ten people, for instance, one or two will be these ‘change agents’ and they invariably work together. I can tell you that it’s no easy chore to exclude these from a forum effort and that’s probably why this forum is the only reputable source of field reports and ‘clean’ information about how to do this work. There are many thousands of people doing this work and many millions who know about it so it’s not an accident that there’s only one, fairly obscure forum to represent it.
I’ve told this story several times but most of that probably disappeared when the forum was destroyed by hackers and agency hooligans at the Montreal and Santiago server facilities in past years before Azti took competent charge of the forum’s safety in 2010.
I was a sign painter and illustrator before I got into the zapper trade, 20 years ago, which led me into the orgonite trade a few years later. About 30 years ago I was working with an older sign painter in St Louis and when we started talking about weird stuff he told me about an interesting and edifying experience that he and his family had in the late 1950s. He and his older son had set up a telescope on the roof in those days to study the planets and a big, saucer UFO showed up and hovered directly over them for some minutes, then went away. This followed an unpleasant time when an aeronautical engineer at McDonnell-Douglas (a weaponry and space contractor for the gov’t) was advising the local UFO-watcher group that many of the UFOs were apparently man-made. He was shouted down and essentially banished from the group, which then focused only on the theosophy silliness that the CIA/AirForce were and still are pushing. He stopped going to the meetings and that’s when the saucer showed up, presumably to intimidate him.
Carol and I are happy to say that we, too, have been intimidated, up close, by quiet antigravity flying saucers that are obviously man-made. I bet the enemy get frustrated when those events just make people feel encouraged rather than spooked . That’s probably why it’s not happening to us, any more. We’ve seen enough ‘spaceships’ that we feel confident that we can determine which ones are made by the ‘local’ sewer rats and which ones are from offworld, too. We’ve even seen an apparently holographic, full size jet airliner that was very quiet and essentially hovered low over the town at a weird angle in the middle of the day. The landing gear was down.