Posted on Leave a comment

The Importance of Electromagnetic Field Remediation by Dr Mercola

Source |

By Dr. Mercola

Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are one of the most pernicious threats to your health. The question is, how do you limit your exposure to healthier levels? Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, one of my longtime mentors, was instrumental in educating me about the influence of EMFs on health. Klinghardt, who founded the Sophia Health Institute1 in 2012 where he’s still actively involved in the treatment of patients, will not even take you on as a new patient unless you agree to address your EMF exposure. He’s that convinced of its influence.

In Germany, which is where Klinghardt hails from, they’ve been using beneficial pulsed EMF for healing purposes since the late 1800s. Even in high school, they were made aware of the fact that disease-causing EMFs created by high power lines, high magnetic fields, and microwave signals were hazardous to health.

“We were made aware that we shouldn’t sleep next to an electric outlet; that we should not have any lights close to our bed or electric alarm clocks. That was already known in the 1960s,” Klinghardt says. Once Klinghardt took up residence in the U.S., that background knowledge sort of fell by the wayside — until he began working with autistic children. At that point, the reality of EMF and its health effects came back to the fore.

“I was looking at this incredible crisis in autism and I started treating autistic kids in the late ‘90s and went to the medical meetings, the biomedical approaches to treat. What was entirely missing in those conferences was the aspect of electromagnetic fields that the child is [experiencing],” he says.

Excessive EMF Exposure During Pregnancy Raises Risk of Autism

Klinghardt conducted a pilot study in which he evaluated the EMF present in the bedroom where the mother slept during pregnancy. It turned out the average exposure of an autistic child to high frequency EMFs from household currents and microwaves from cellphones and other wireless technologies was twentyfold higher than that of the non-autistic children. Unfortunately, the study never made it into publication, but it convinced him that EMFs were an unacknowledged factor that contributes to autism.

Another study cited by Klinghardt shows that microwave radiation from cellphones, Wi-Fi routers and similar devices concentrate twentyfold in the womb, meaning whatever the reading is outside the womb, the measurement will be 20 times higher inside the mother. As noted by Klinghardt, “Unfortunately, the membranes around the womb have that strange effect in significantly concentrating the ambient EMFs that the mother is in, reaching levels that are not sustainable for human development.”

The real-world impact of EMFs is also evident in his clinical practice, as families with autistic children who take EMF remediation report seriously significant improvements. These findings have also made Klinghardt passionate about warning would-be parents about the importance of avoiding EMFs during pregnancy to reduce the risk of having an autistic child. Unfortunately, Americans have been slow to grasp the importance of such advice.

US Needs to Take EMF Exposure Seriously, Before It’s Too Late

According to Klinghardt, Russia and Iran have some of the strictest rules governing the amplitude of cellphone radiation.

“My brother sent this to me (and I have a Russian colleague working with me) of a lecture that Putin gave to his assembly [where he] basically said, ‘We do not need to go to war with America. America is committing collective suicide by the way they are using electricity. We just have to wait until they are all in the psychiatric hospital.’ That was Putin pretty much verbatim translated …

[Putin] wants Russia to be a strong nation again, and so he is doing it differently. He is doing it by limiting the electromagnetic exposures, knowing it’s going to create a whole different crop of children that are going to grow up to be intelligent, to be leaders in the world, to be scientists.

[The U.S. is] a dying nation, basically, because of the way we are fluoridating the water, the way we have adapted the vaccine program, the electro-smog. We’ve created a perfect storm to dumb down a whole nation.”

But autism is not the only problem exacerbated by uncontrolled EMF exposure. This kind of nonionizing radiation has also been linked to Alzheimer’s and infertility, especially in men, and all three of these problems are rocketing skyward in terms of prevalence. At their current trajectories, society as we know it will eventually cease to function.

The Threat of Human Extinction Is All Too Real

According to Klinghardt, Barrie Trower, a leading scientist for the British MI6, explored the effects of microwaves on human health by exposing children living in orphanages to various frequencies and levels. This research was later brought into psychiatric hospitals, where they discovered you can sterilize an entire population by exposing them to 2.4 gigahertz (GHz) — the same carrier frequency now used in Western countries for cellphone services.

“It’s estimated that over two or three generations of exposure, ongoing exposure to the same cellphone radiation that we’re using now, we will all be sterile and we will basically die out as a species,” he says. Klinghardt also cites research by Olle Johansson2 (whom I interviewed in 2008), a neuroscientist and tenured professor at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, in which he found that areas with the highest density of Alzheimer’s disease in Sweden were directly correlated to the areas with the highest EMF exposures.

Johansson has issued warnings about cellphone radiation for over a decade now, and has come under intense pressure to resign from Karolinska, as the cellphone industry has threatened to withdraw its funding to the institute if he remains. Johansson is currently asking for private donations to continue his work on EMF.3

Practical Nighttime Remediation Strategies

One of the best prevention strategies I’ve found so far is to eliminate exposure to extremely low frequency (ELF; frequencies in the 50 to 60 Hz range) electric and magnetic fields during sleep, as this is a most important time for your brain. During deep sleep, your brain’s glymphatic system is activated, allowing it to detoxify and eliminate accumulated waste products, including amyloid-beta proteins, which are a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease.

In most areas, the only way to do that is by turning off the electricity to your bedroom by flipping the circuit breaker. Exceptions include Chicago and New York, as the building codes there require all electrical wires to be in a conduit. As a result, if you live in either of these places, all you need to do is unplug your electronic equipment. You do not have to turn off your electricity, which makes it a whole lot easier to remediate EMF.

If you are ill or pregnant, you’d be wise to follow Klinghardt’s stricter recommendation, which is to shut down electricity in the entire house — with the exception of your refrigerator, air conditioning or heating, and any essential medical equipment — not just the circuitry in your bedroom. Klinghardt explains:

“Electric fields are very funny. You can switch off the electric field in your bedroom and have it on two rooms away, and through induction, the field can still jump from one circuitry to the next one and you can still be in a really bad field. We are talking about body voltage — that’s sort of what builds up in your system when you’re in a field of the low-frequency, the 60 Hz field from a household current. At nighttime, we want the fuses off …

[I]f possible, spend a few hundred dollars and get a remote switch installed properly, so that from your bed you can click a button and it switches off the fuses at the fuse box. That’s No. 1. Secondly, [if] you are in an apartment building and you have people below, next to you, above you, my first line of advice is to move if possible.

If it is not possible, you can create a protective wall against the neighbor simply by using aluminum foil, the sparkly, more shiny side toward the neighbor. The entire wall needs to be covered.

You can also do that with the floor toward the person below you, but it needs to be earthed. There needs to be an alligator clip on it … conducted into the wall outlet into the earth. This works beautifully [against] microwaves — [blocking] the cellphone router that the neighbor has underneath you, above you, next to you …

The earthing is for the low-frequency fields (low-frequency emitting devices). It’s a practical solution we often have to do because it costs at best one or two rolls of aluminum foil, plus a cable from RadioShack, so you can do that for less than $20 …”

The Worst Culprits Are Right Inside Your Own Home

It’s important to realize that if you have a Wi-Fi router, you have a cellphone tower inside your home. Ideally, you’d eliminate your Wi-Fi and simply use a wired connection. If you absolutely must have a router, you can place it inside a shielded bag when not in use. You can find shielded items online, or make your own using Swiss Shield fabric.

Be aware that some other forms of radiation can be very difficult to shield against. This includes frequencies in the 400,000 Hz range that police and fire departments are using. If you live close to a police or fire station and have developed health problems since you moved in, moving would be your best option, as this wavelength is virtually impossible to shield with any known technology. For most people, however, the worst exposure is your household electrical currents, your cellphone (when not in airplane mode) and Wi-Fi router.

Another important point to remember is that EMF will affect you regardless of whether you actually feel it or not. Those who are electrosensitive are physically aware of their exposure, but regardless of sensitivity, the disease rates are the same. On average, a person will experience biological effects from a cellphone at a distance of 12 feet.

Using a meter, I discovered I was still exposed to unhealthy levels at a distance of 30 feet, so when I’m not using my cellphone, I always keep it in airplane mode and/or inside a Faraday bag.

According to Klinghardt, the degree to which patients report improvement of their conditions directly correlates to their EMF mitigation efforts. Those who report no improvement at their four-month checkup have done little or nothing to mitigate their exposure, whereas those who report significant improvements have taken proactive steps. “It’s black and white,” he says.

Daytime Remediation

Reducing your EMF exposure during the daytime is trickier, as most of us need to use electronics during the daytime, and move about in areas that are Wi-Fi enabled. For seriously ill patients, Klinghardt recommends using Stetzer filters to decrease the level of dirty electricity or electromagnetic interference that being generated. You can also take these with you to work.

Also reconsider your use of compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs, as they emit microwaves. “Every (CFL) lightbulb is like a small cellphone tower emitting at those frequencies, which is absolutely devastating to the health of people,” Klinghardt says. “Those need to go and they need to be replaced with the old (incandescent) light bulbs.

They are safe. They cost more in electricity, but the cost to health that people have by [using] CFLs is a million times more than what you save on electricity.” Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are also best avoided.

As for internet, opt for a wired Ethernet connection and remove your Wi-Fi. When not in use, make sure your cellphone is in airplane mode and/or inside a shielded Faraday bag. When you do use a cellphone, you can reduce your exposure by texting (and keeping it short) or using Blue Tube (air tube) headphones so you can keep the phone further away from your body. Avoid wearing a Bluetooth earpiece and standard headphones, as they conduct the electric field right into your brain through your ears.

“In general, people should go back and insist on having land lines in their homes and at work and use that as much as possible. Only use the cellphone as an emergency device or for texting,” Klinghardt says. “Lastly, there’s the protective clothing. is a good website that has all of that, including the full burqa …

[T]here are very attractive T-shirts, there is underwear. That’s the minimum I require of my patients with neurological disease and autistic kids; they need to wear that 24/7, and that has made a huge difference … By protecting your larger part of the body with the T-shirt, you get more benefits for your brain than when, for example, you wear a [shielded] cap on your head.”

How EMF Causes Harm

EMFs cause harm through a number of different mechanisms. As explained by Klinghardt, the radiation affects your microbiome, turning what might otherwise be beneficial microbes pathogenic. Research by Martin Pall also shows that microwave radiation activates your voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) — channels in the outer membrane of your cells.

Once activated, the VGCCs open up, allowing an abnormal influx of calcium ions into the cell. This increased intracellular calcium and the accompanying increase in calcium signaling appears to be responsible for a majority of the damage that occurs. For more details on this, please see my previous interview with Pall. For this reason, natural calcium channel blockers such as magnesium can be helpful against EMF exposure, and it’s important to make sure you’re not magnesium deficient.

Magnesium threonate appears particularly beneficial as it acts as a potent anti-retroviral agent. Klinghardt recommends taking it to bowel tolerance, meaning you increase the dosage until you get slightly lose stools. For his patients, he always combines it with 12X calcium phosphate (calcium phosphoric), a homeopathic that helps modulate the calcium channels.

Environmental Impacts of EMF

Klinghardt also notes that electro-smog plays a significant role in the disappearance of bees and other crucial pollinators — that in combination with toxic pesticides and herbicides. And, as beneficial insects die off, disease-bearing ticks become more prevalent, as they turn out to be rather insensitive to cellphone radiation.

“The devastating thing is that what controlled the tick population in the past was birds. Birds eat ticks, but birds cannot live on ticks alone, they need all the other insects, and so there’s been a dramatic disappearance in songbirds and insect-eating birds,” Klinghardt says. “There’s a dramatic reduction of [insects], but only where there’s exposure to microwaves. We have German footage that shows trees, whole forests, dying just because a cellphone tower was put up.

The cellphone radiation, the way it’s used right now is completely against life and it’s compounded by the heavy metals that are in us, especially the aluminum that comes from the sky and from the air we breathe. We know that the glyphosate and atrazine and other herbicides, pesticides, along with [food] preservatives, all have a compounding effect in our body.

We have basically created a perfect storm, which we can still by eating organically, and by avoiding certain things, certain environments …”

I have become firmly convinced uncontrolled EMF exposure is a major, hidden factor that contributes to virtually all chronic disease, and hinders recovery. Klinghardt’s clinical experience supports this view, as patients rarely get well unless or until they start taking EMF remediation seriously.

Keep in mind that if you are ill, simply reducing your cellphone use from several hours a day to just a few hours is not likely to go far enough. You really need to take more drastic steps to limit, and ideally eliminate electric and magnetic field exposure, at least at night.

Note from Ed:  you can help neutralize the harmful effects of EMF with Orgonite. Consider placing some Tower Busters around your property as per the recommendations found here.

Additional Articles of Interest

Posted on Leave a comment

Is Your Cell Phone Putting You at Risk? by Dr. Mercola

The war rages on about the safety of cell phones. Depending on which side of the argument you listen to, there’s either nothing to fear, or your phone is causing grave harm when it comes into close contact with your body. Where does the real truth lie?

Source Added commentary by Ed in red.

The year 2014 marked the first time in history that there were officially more mobile (cell phone) devices than people in the world – approximately 7.2 billion.

Although significantly lower, the number of cell phone users is forecast to reach 4.77 billion by the year 2017.

That’s a lot of cell phones and cell phone users. But what’s even more fascinating about all these mobile devices is the behavior that surrounds them:

  • Nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults own a smartphone and over 250 million of them use their phones an average of six days a week
  • The average cellphone owner checks their phone 110 times a day, or about nine times each hour
  • A whopping 46 percent of smartphone owners say “they couldn’t live without” their phones
  • As of December, 2015, 47 percent of homes used only cell phones
  • More than about half of U.K. cell phone users suffer from “nomophobia,” or the fear of being without their phone (and the number may be even higher for American users)

Clearly, cell phones aren’t going away anytime soon. I use my smartphone every day, too. But how I use mine most likely differs from how the typical user uses theirs…

The Enigma of Cell Phone Safety

Most conventional experts don’t view cell phone exposure as a problem, mainly because they only look at one component of cell phone safety.

Their focus is on the thermal effects of cell phones and how your body absorbs the radiofrequency energy. The industry insists that because the energy of the fields is too low to cause heating of tissues, it can’t have any biological effect.

These thermal or tissue heating effects are measured and assigned a rating known as SAR, which stands for Specific Absorption Rate.

Industry suggests you compare SAR ratings, but the numbers are meaningless

When buying a wireless phone, the industry suggests you compare ratings and purchase one with a lower rating.

Please understand that the SAR rating by itself is virtually worthless.

The SAR level only estimates the heat from the radiation penetrating into your head from a cell phone – just ONE component of concern!

The SAR level does not measure the risk from the frequencies of the cell phone, the erratic pulsing and modulation of the signals, or the magnetic fields created by the batteries.

Scientists now know that many of the effects from cell phones are non-thermal. In other words, they occur at levels too low to cause significant heating to tissues.

What You Need to Know About Cell Phone Radiation

The frequency of a cell phone’s waves falls between those emitted by FM radios and those from microwave ovens, all of which are considered “non-ionizing” forms of radiation.

When you make a call, text, or use data on your cell phone, here’s what happens:

Your phone sends radiofrequency, or RF waves from its antenna to nearby cell towers, and receives RF waves in return to its antenna.

If you are holding the phone next to your face, as most people do, then about 70 percent of the energy from the antenna is absorbed straight into your head.

As you can see from the diagram below, age makes a difference in how much of this energy can be absorbed into the tissue. A younger child’s skull is much thinner than an adult’s and still developing, therefore more radiation is able to penetrate the brain.

It’s not until around age 20 that your brain is fully developed.

These visual images should serve as a powerful reminder to parents that it’s never a good idea to allow a child to talk on a cell phone held close to the head!


As you move your cell phone away from your head, this radiation decreases rapidly. So, clearly, the further away from your body you can keep your phone, the better.

Incidentally, the manufacturer of one of the top-selling cell phones advises against direct body contact with their phones. This is what they say right on their website:

“To reduce exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, the supplied headphones, or other similar accessories. Carry phone at least 5mm away from your body to ensure exposure levels remain at or below the as-tested levels.”

One of the most important bits of advice I can give you is to avoid holding your phone directly against your head, especially while your call connects which is when the power surge is greatest.

Using your speakerphone function or a safe headset to keep your phone a safe distance away from your body is a much better option.

But Why Does the Wireless Industry Still Insist Cell Phones Are Safe?

You can search online and find study after study that says cell phone usage is safe. The wireless industry claims that thousands of studies have failed to pinpoint adverse effects.

But, is that really true?

First you need to dig deep and find out who funded the study. If it’s an industry-funded study, the results presented are just about guaranteed to favor the industry. Why would they publish results that didn’t?

But just because countless studies might conclude “no risk found,” it doesn’t mean those were the real scientific findings of the investigation!

The earlier one starts using cell phones, the more harmful its potential effects can be

Dr. Henry Lai, a University of Washington scientist in cellular and molecular engineering, reviewed 85 papers on the DNA-damaging effects of cell phone radiation. He and his colleague had found from their own research that cell phone radiation could cause DNA damage in brain cells.

What did he find when he took a closer look at these studies?

A whopping three-fourths of the papers that showed no toxic effects were funded either by the wireless industry or the military. Eighty percent of those that showed potential negative effects were not linked to the industry.

Even Time reported:

Independent studies on cell phone radiation found dangers at more than twice the rate of industry-funded studies.

We’re talking about a very lucrative industry here… The total revenue of the U.S. mobile wireless industry is over $171 billion!

Could it be that the wireless industry may be twisting science just enough to dodge or at least postpone regulation? They do have a lot at stake…

The 2011 Ruling That Delivered a Major Blow to the Wireless Industry

As cell phone usage around the world expands, evidence continues to mount against their safety, even though the industry still insists cell phones are safe.

Possibly the biggest blow to the industry came in 2011 when the International Agency for research on Cancer (IARC), an arm of the World Health Organization (WHO), declared cell phones a Class B carcinogen.

This classification puts cell phones squarely in the same category of certain pesticides and heavy metals as well as engine exhaust.

But that’s not all… There are now more than 20,000 publications in the scientific literature that show significant biological effects at exposures well within safety standards. Including about 4,000 that include non-thermal effects.

How Cell Phones Impact Your Cells’ Energy Centers – Your Mitochondria

Cell phones have been shown to harm your cells’ mitochondria

Your body uses electrical fields to communicate between your cells. The electromagnetic fields emitted by the phones are far more damaging to your body. Because they interfere with your body’s own cellular communication.

Another major way cell phones can potentially impact you is through their effect on your mitochondria within your cells.

Most of your cells have several hundred mitochondria. Over 90 percent of the energy that your body needs to function properly comes from the mitochondria. So their well-being is essential to your energy production.

Not only are they your body’s primary source of energy. Your cells’ mitochondria determine the speed at which your body ages. If your mitochondria are working optimally, your body ages at a normal rate.

Researchers have discovered that the radiation from cell phones can harm your mitochondria, including flipping certain genes within the mitochondria.

As important as your mitochondria are to your health, this potential damaging effect on genes is very concerning to me.

Is the Newest Technology Any Safer?

Industry tries to assure us that third and fourth generation cell phones are safer in terms of non-ionizing radiation.

But are they really?

There’s no proof that 3G or 4G is any safer. And if anything, the preliminary research suggests they may be even less safe.

Here’s the problem…

Today’s standards for radiofrequency emissions weren’t designed for cell phones.

Rather, the current federal standards were developed to guard against thermal effects. But remember, as I explained above, that’s not the issue. As we’ve already seen, most of the studies on cell phones show non-thermal effects.

What’s worrisome now is that evidence is suggesting exposure to cell phone radiation can have biological effects without raising temperature.

Radio frequency waves from cell phones have also been shown to produce “stress” proteins in human cells. Proteins that the body produces for self-protection.

I agree that getting rid of your cell phone is probably not an option these days. Today’s cell phones are much more than phones.  They’re often your camera, video recorder, hand-held computer, and your lifeline to staying in touch with your work and family.

But with all this distressing data and questionable research, there must be something we can do to help minimize exposure. I believe there is… Continue reading on

Note from Ed & Roz ~ You can help mitigate the EMF being emitted from your cellphone by sticking an Orgone Energy Plain piece to it. Check them out here.
Other articles of interest:

Posted on Leave a comment

After Years of Secrecy, Cellphone Radiation Risks are Finally Being Revealed

After Years of Secrecy, Cellphone Radiation Risks are Finally Being Revealed

Source | Article

Written By: Tracey Watson March 14, 2017

In 2015, New York Times writer Nick Bilton wrote an article entitled “The Health Concerns in Wearable Tech,” warning the public that devices like smartphones and Apple Watches emit a low-level radiation which has been linked to cancer, brain tumors and other problems when worn close to the body for extended periods. His article was based on a press release issued by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in May of 2011, which warned, “The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer1, associated with wireless phone use.”

Bilton was not praised for his public health warning; in fact, the mainstream media attacked him, with many calling for his dismissal from the Times.

The truth is, there is ample evidence that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields emitted by cell phones and other devices could cause brain cancer. This has just been reinforced yet again, in a document released by the California Department of Public Health, entitled simply “Cell Phones and Health.”

The Department has been sitting on the document, which has been revised several times, for the past seven years, refusing to make it public. It was only when Joel Moskowitz, director of the Center for Family and Community Health at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health, sued the Department last year, and the judge indicated that she would order the release of the document, that the Department made it public.

The document states clearly, “Health officials are concerned about possible health effects from cell phone EMFs because some recent studies suggest that long-term cell phone use may increase the risk of brain cancer and other health problems.” [Emphasis added]

It also notes that studies have found that people diagnosed with certain forms of brain cancer are more likely to have used cellphones in the preceding decade and that the cancers usually occurred on the side of the head that their cellphones were most often used on. It adds, “These studies suggest that regular cell phone use increases the risk of developing some kinds of brain cancer.”

[su_button url=”” target=”_blank” style=”flat” background=”#e51f1f” color=”#ffffff” size=”4″ center=”yes” icon=”icon: check-square-o” text_shadow=”0px 0px 0px #000000″]Continue Reading[/su_button]

Additional Articles of Interest:

Posted on

Cell Phone Radiation Causing Brain Cancer

Original Title: California government buried the truth about cell phone radiation causing brain cancer… FULL TEXT of once-secret document reveals how EMFs penetrate “deeper into a child’s brain”

Source | Article

**(Natural News) A once-secret document detailing links between cell phones and brain cancer has been released by order of a California court. Entitled, “Cell Phones and Health,” the document was demanded in a lawsuit filed by Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., director of the Center for Family and Community Health at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health.

“I would like this document to see the light of day because it will inform the public that there is concern within the California Department of Public Health that cellphone radiation is a risk, and it will provide them with some information about how to reduce those risks,” Moskowitz told a local CBS affiliate.

The document says that “long-term cell phone use may increase the risk of brain cancer and other health problems” and admits that “cell phone EMFs can affect nearby cells and tissues.” In a special warning section about children, it also explains that “EMFs can pass deeper into a child’s brain than an adult’s.”

EMF stands for ElectroMagnetic Field. Follow more news about EMF at According to the document, there’s no evidence that EMF blocking devices for cell phones actually work, by the way. (I haven’t personally tested any in my lab, so I can’t say whether this is true or false, but from a commonsense scientific point of view, if they really blocked EMF signals from the phone, the phone would no longer be able to make calls because it couldn’t communicate with cell towers.)
California government deliberately hid this information from the public

The California government actively hid this document from the public for at least seven years, likely under pressure from industry lobbyists who have long sought to conceal the evidence of harm caused by cell phone radiation. In the same way that biotech companies seek to conceal the harm of GMOs… and pesticides manufacturers conceal the harm of pesticides… and vaccine promoters conceal the harm of mercury in vaccines, the cell phone industry doesn’t want any evidence linking EMFs and brain cancer to see the light of day.

In truth, your brain is under a massive chemical, electromagnetic and propaganda assault on a daily basis. Some of the many attacks on your brain include:

– Brain-damaging fluoride in the public water supply

– Mercury preservatives in flu shots

– Pesticides in non-organic food products

– EMFs from mobile phones

– WiFi broadcast signals

– Fake news media propaganda

– Brain-altering medications such as antidepressants

Follow more news about brain health at
Read the full text of the once-secret California document on cell phones and EMFs

Here’s the full text of the California document, now posted at Natural News:

Division of Environmental and Occupational Disease Control / California Department of Public Health

[su_button url=”” style=”flat” background=”#e51f1f” color=”#ffffff” size=”4″ center=”yes” icon=”icon: check-square-o” text_shadow=”0px 0px 0px #000000″]Continue Reading[/su_button]